H. Conrad Cunningham
12 September 2018
Copyright (C) 2017, 2018, H. Conrad Cunningham
Acknowledgements: I originally created these slides in Fall 2017 to accompany what is now Section 6.2, Using Top-Down Stepwise Refinement, in the 2018 version of the textbook Exploring Languages with Interpreters and Functional Programming. This is part of Chapter 6, Procedural Abstraction.
Browser Advisory: The HTML version of this document may require use of a browser that supports the display of MathML. A good choice as of September 2018 is a recent version of Firefox from Mozilla.
Code: The Haskell module for the Square root case
study is in the source file Sqrt.hs
. The source file TestSqrt.hs
includes some smoke testing code.
Illustrate use of procedural abstraction
Introduce a development method for programs with several functions
Introduce modular programming using Haskell modules
Procedural abstraction: separate properties of action from implementation details
Break complex actions into subprograms; develop program as sequence of calls
Data abstraction: separate properties of data from representation details
Identify key data representations; develop program around these and associated operations
Problem: find the number such that
and .
Newton’s method of successive approximations
Top-down stepwise refinement – adapt general method to Haskell
Start with high-level solution
define one or more functions
include both concrete code (Haskell) and abstract code (pseudocode)
give type signatures of functions
specify inputs, outputs, and termination conditions
Choose an abstract (incomplete) part
refine it into subparts: concrete Haskell and abstract pseudocode
refine data structures if needed
consider relevant criteria (termination, time, space, generality, etc.)
stay with problem terminology and notation
if not a good choice, back up and try other choices
Continue previous step until all parts executable and meet criteria
Postulate function with signature
Encode Newton method step 2
goodEnough
determines
when sufficiently close to solution
improve
generates better
guess
improve guess x
must
always yield better guess (approach base case)
improve
Refine improve
in Newton step 3 – assuming
precondition x >= 0 && guess > 0
average
computes mean of
two values
new guess average guess (x/guess)
closer to exact solution (assuming guess > 0
)
goodEnough
Refine goodEnough
be wary of inexact floating point arithmetic!
choose tolerance of 0.001 (might not work in all cases)
abs
absolute
value function from standard library (Prelude)
square
easy (could just
be guess * guess
)
Sufficient just to use 1
hide guess
argument to
sqrtIter
avoid name clash with sqrt
function
in standard Prelude
Sqrt.hs
module Sqrt -- put in file "Sqrt.hs"
(sqrt') -- only export sqrt', others hidden
where
sqrt' :: Double -> Double
sqrt' x | x >= 0 = sqrt_iter 1 x
sqrt_iter :: Double -> Double -> Double
sqrt_iter guess x
| good_enough guess x = guess
| otherwise = sqrt_iter (improve guess x) x
good_enough :: Double -> Double -> Bool
good_enough guess x = abs (square guess - x) < 0.001
square :: Double -> Double
square x = x * x
average :: Double -> Double -> Double
average x y = (x + y) / 2
improve :: Double -> Double -> Double
improve guess x = average guess (x/guess)
Example use of Sqrt
module (from TestSqrt.hs
){type=“text/plain”}
Top-down stepwise refinement method
Haskell modules
Newton’s method applied to square root
Square Root module Sqrt.hs
Smoke testing module TestSqrt.hs